David Neff, has posted “What’s the fuss about Recapitulation Theology?” at his Ancient Evangelical Future blog.
It’s worthwhile noting that many are interpreting the renewal of this idea as a threat to Penal Substitution. Yet as one person noted in the comments section of this post,
Recapitulation shouldn’t be seen so much as a theory of how the atonement is transacted, but rather the telos point or raison d’etre for Chrit’s Atonement. It’s not penal substitution or recapitulation it’s both working hand in hand.
I would suggest that recapitulation modifies penal substitution such that both provide a vigorous understanding of the atonement. Something I believe that neither does by themselves.
Would you mind having a look at this Penal Substitution debate I’m having with a Calvinist:
http://catholicdefense.googlepages.com/psdebate
I believe the doctrine to be thoroughly unbiblical.